Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?

Awesomeness, Personal, Political, Speechless — Sawyer @ 11:20 pm

Submitted by comandergood on June 8, 2006 – 7:06am

(copied from a free thinkers’s blog)
Questions and Answers about Foreign Policy (and the U.S. Invasion of Iraq)

Q:Daddy, why did we have to attack Iraq?
A:Because they had weapons of mass destruction.
Q:But the inspectors didn’t find any weapons of mass destruction.
A:That’s because the Iraqis were hiding them.
Q:And that’s why we invaded Iraq?
A:Yep. Invasions always work better than inspections.
Q:But after we invaded them, we STILL didn’t find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?
A:That’s because the weapons are so well hidden. Don’t worry, we’ll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.
Q:Why did Iraq want all those weapons of mass destruction?
A:To use them in a war, silly.
Q:I’m confused. If they had all those weapons that they planned to use in a war, then why didn’t they use any of those weapons when we went to war with them?
A:Well, obviously they didn’t want anyone to know they had those weapons, so they chose to die by the thousands rather than defend themselves.
Q:That doesn’t make sense. Why would they choose to die if they had all those big weapons with which they could have fought back?
A:It’s a different culture. It’s not supposed to make sense.
Q:I don’t know about you, but I don’t think they had any of those weapons our government said they did.
A:Well, you know, it doesn’t matter whether or not they had those weapons. We had another good reason to invade them anyway.
Q:And what was that?
A:Even if Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction, Saddam Hussein was a cruel dictator, which is another good reason to invade another country.
Q:Why? What does a cruel dictator do that makes it OK to invade his country?
A:Well, for one thing, he tortured his own people.
Q:Kind of like what they do in China?
A:Don’t go comparing China to Iraq. China is a good economic competitor, where millions of people work for slave wages in sweatshops to make U.S. corporations richer.
Q:So if a country lets its people be exploited for American corporate gain, it’s a good country, even if that country tortures people?
A:Right.
Q:Why were people in Iraq being tortured?
A:For political crimes, mostly, like criticizing the government. People who criticized the government in Iraq were sent to prison and tortured.
Q:Isn’t that exactly what happens in China?
A:I told you, China is different.
Q:What’s the difference between China and Iraq?
A:Well, for one thing, Iraq was ruled by the Ba’ath party, while China is Communist.
Q:Didn’t you once tell me Communists were bad?
A:No, just Cuban Communists are bad.
Q:How are the Cuban Communists bad?
A:Well, for one thing, people who criticize the government in Cuba are sent to prison and tortured.
Q:Like in Iraq?
A:Exactly.
Q:And like in China, too?
A:I told you, China’s a good economic competitor. Cuba, on the other hand, is not.
Q:How come Cuba isn’t a good economic competitor?
A:Well, you see, back in the early 1960s, our government passed some laws that made it illegal for Americans to trade or do any business with Cuba until they stopped being Communists and started being capitalists like us.
Q:But if we got rid of those laws, opened up trade with Cuba, and started doing business with them, wouldn’t that help the Cubans become capitalists?
A:Don’t be a smart-ass.
Q:I didn’t think I was being one.
A:Well, anyway, they also don’t have freedom of religion in Cuba.
Q:Kind of like China and the Falun Gong movement?
A:I told you, stop saying bad things about China. Anyway, Saddam Hussein came to power through a military coup, so he’s not really a legitimate leader anyway.
Q:What’s a military coup?
A:That’s when a military general takes over the government of a country by force, instead of holding free elections like we do in the United States.
Q:Didn’t the ruler of Pakistan come to power by a military coup?
A:You mean General Pervez Musharraf? Uh, yeah, he did, but Pakistan is our friend.
Q:Why is Pakistan our friend if their leader is illegitimate?
A:I never said Pervez Musharraf was illegitimate.
Q:Didn’t you just say a military general who comes to power by forcibly overthrowing the legitimate government of a nation is an illegitimate leader?
A:Only Saddam Hussein. Pervez Musharraf is our friend, because he helped us invade Afghanistan.
Q:Why did we invade Afghanistan?
A:Because of what they did to us on September 11th.
Q:What did Afghanistan do to us on September 11th?
A:Well, on September 11th, nineteen men – fifteen of them Saudi Arabians – hijacked four airplanes and flew three of them into buildings in New York and Washington, killing 3,000 innocent people.
Q:So how did Afghanistan figure into all that?
A:Afghanistan was where those bad men trained, under the oppressive rule of the Taliban.
Q:Aren’t the Taliban those bad radical Islamics who chopped off people’s heads and hands?
A:Yes, that’s exactly who they were. Not only did they chop off people’s heads and hands, but they oppressed women, too.
Q:Didn’t the Bush administration give the Taliban 43 million dollars back in May of 2001?
A:Yes, but that money was a reward because they did such a good job fighting drugs.
Q:Fighting drugs?
A:Yes, the Taliban were very helpful in stopping people from growing opium poppies.
Q:How did they do such a good job?
A:Simple. If people were caught growing opium poppies, the Taliban would have their hands and heads cut off.
Q:So, when the Taliban cut off people’s heads and hands for growing flowers, that was OK, but not if they cut people’s heads and hands off for other reasons?
A:Yes. It’s OK with us if radical Islamic fundamentalists cut off people’s hands for growing flowers, but it’s cruel if they cut off people’s hands for stealing bread.
Q:Don’t they also cut off people’s hands and heads in Saudi Arabia?
A:That’s different. Afghanistan was ruled by a tyrannical patriarchy that oppressed women and forced them to wear burqas whenever they were in public, with death by stoning as the penalty for women who did not comply.
Q:Don’t Saudi women have to wear burqas in public, too?
A:No, Saudi women merely wear a traditional Islamic body covering.
Q:What’s the difference?
A:The traditional Islamic covering worn by Saudi women is a modest yet fashionable garment that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers. The burqa, on the other hand, is an evil tool of patriarchal oppression that covers all of a woman’s body except for her eyes and fingers.
Q:It sounds like the same thing with a different name.
A:Now, don’t go comparing Afghanistan and Saudi Arabia. The Saudis are our friends.
Q:But I thought you said 15 of the 19 hijackers on September 11th were from Saudi Arabia.
A:Yes, but they trained in Afghanistan.
Q:Who trained them?
A:A very bad man named Osama bin Laden.
Q:Was he from Afghanistan?
A:Uh, no, he was from Saudi Arabia too. But he was a bad man, a very bad man.
Q:I seem to recall he was our friend once.
A:Only when we helped him and the mujahadeen repel the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan back in the 1980s.
Q:Who are the Soviets? Was that the Evil Communist Empire Ronald Reagan talked about?
A:There are no more Soviets. The Soviet Union broke up in 1990 or thereabouts, and now they have elections and capitalism like us. We call them Russians now.
Q:So the Soviets – I mean, the Russians – are now our friends?
A:Well, not really. You see, they were our friends for many years after they stopped being Soviets, but then they decided not to support our invasion of Iraq, so we’re mad at them now. We’re also mad at the French and the Germans because they didn’t help us invade Iraq either.
Q:So the French and Germans are evil, too?
A:Not exactly evil, but just bad enough that we had to rename French fries and French toast to Freedom Fries and Freedom Toast.
Q:Do we always rename foods whenever another country doesn’t do what we want them to do?
A:No, we just do that to our friends. Our enemies, we invade.
Q:But wasn’t Iraq one of our friends back in the 1980s?
A:Well, yeah. For a while.
Q:Was Saddam Hussein ruler of Iraq back then?
A:Yes, but at the time he was fighting against Iran, which made him our friend, temporarily.
Q:Why did that make him our friend?
A:Because at that time, Iran was our enemy.
Q:Isn’t that when he gassed the Kurds?
A:Yeah, but since he was fighting against Iran at the time, we looked the other way, to show him we were his friend.
Q:So anyone who fights against one of our enemies automatically becomes our friend?
A:Most of the time, yes.
Q:And anyone who fights against one of our friends is automatically an enemy?
A:Sometimes that’s true, too. However, if American corporations can profit by selling weapons to both sides at the same time, all the better.
Q:Why?
A:Because war is good for the economy, which means war is good for America. Also, since God is on America’s side, anyone who opposes war is a godless unAmerican Communist. Do you understand now why we attacked Iraq?
Q:I think so. We attacked them because God wanted us to, right?
A:Yes.
Q:But how did we know God wanted us to attack Iraq?
A:Well, you see, God personally speaks to George W. Bush and tells him what to do.
Q:So basically, what you’re saying is that we attacked Iraq because George W. Bush hears voices in his head?
A:Yes! You finally understand how the world works. Now close your eyes, make yourself comfortable, and go to sleep. Good night.
Q:Good night, Daddy.
2003 anarchie bunker

Truth vs Lies

Awesomeness, Humor, Images, Political — Sawyer @ 12:47 pm

You Lie.

Political, Speechless, Videos — Tags: , — Sawyer @ 5:16 pm

This couldn’t be more truthful about Faux News.

American Hypocrisy

Images, Political — Sawyer @ 10:44 pm

9.12 DC TEA PARTY – MARCH FOOTAGE WITH INTERVIEWS

Political, Videos, WTF — Sawyer @ 11:12 pm

Some Right-Wingers and Conservatives Are Downright Scary

Political, Videos — Sawyer @ 8:49 pm

I haven’t heard someone say it like it is, in some time. This was rather refreshing as it seems this is a very tangible approach to the way this country is going. If you disagree, fine no worries here, that’s the beauty of the 1st Amendment.

Glenn Beck: Cars.gov allows government to takeover your computer

Mind Numbing, Political, WTF — Tags: , — Sawyer @ 4:04 pm

This is a mis-leading headline as these folks on this show go much deeper than saying the government can take over just your computer. My comments are below. Enjoy.

I just watched this video, and it’s only marginally accurate. Here’s a simplified approach at my thoughts about this video…

Accurate:

  1. There is the reality of malware, spyware, and other malicious software on the internet, and that safe browsing habits need to be employed.
  2. That transmitting information through that website and that application specifically can be monitored, audited, disclosed, etc. by the host application (this is common practice as it allows the website to be held harmless should fraud, or other malicious intent from the user occur. Basically a statement of “provided as-is with no warranty” type thing).
  3. That octopus do in-fact regenerate tentacles.

Inaccurate:

  1. That anything outside the direct usage of that application specifically the government can legally monitor by the government. … this statement is absolutely untrue.
  2. That everything in your home, is now property of the government. (This statement Kim made, is unbelievably asinine. And shows exactly what’s wrong with the Glenn Beck show if he’s bringing on people that say things like that, which is basically fear mongering.)
  3. That your computer is now the property of the US Government.
  4. “Jumping inside you and seizing all your personal and private information” – News anchor Kim … this an outright lie.
  5. “They can continue to track you… basically forever… once they’ve tapped into your system.” – News anchor Kim … this is also an outright lie.
  6. “The government ‘of course’ has like, malware systems and tracking cookies and they can tap in, any time they want.” – News anchor Kim … this is sensationalized lying at it’s best.

Unreal that this type of garbage is thrown upon the watching audience… which my guess is non-the-wiser about the technical inaccuracies in the majority of any statement made in this clip.

Fox caught with its pants down on ABC attacks

Funny, Political — Tags: , — Sawyer @ 11:06 am

Here’s another fine example of Faux News and their hypocritical approach to journalism.

= = = = =

The O’Reilly Procedure

Political — Tags: , , — Sawyer @ 5:53 pm

This is a fabulous read on Robert Ebert’s online journal about not necessarily Bill O’Reilly speciflcally, but more to his actions and behavior and what the harmful trends it’s causing in our society. Now, it just so happens to be a topic on a guy I don’t care for at all, but that is merely coincidence. I know there are plenty of others out there that this very concept of “school yard bullying” can apply to.

= = = = =

Bill O’Reilly has been brought low by the same process that afflicted Jerry Springer. Once respected journalists, they sold their souls for higher ratings, and follow their siren song. Springer is honest about it: “I’m going to Hell for what I do, and I know it,” he’s likes to say. O’Reilly insists he is dealing only with the truth. When his guests disagree with him, he shouts at them, calls them liars, talks over them, and behaves like a schoolyard bully.

Full Article

Obama blocks list of visitors to White House

Political — Tags: , , — Sawyer @ 7:45 pm

So far we’re in for more of the same…

= = = = =

The Obama White House has denied requests by msnbc.com and a nonpartisan watchdog group for the names of White House visitors. The watchdog group says it filed suit Tuesday, accusing Obama of “following the same anti-transparency policy as the Bush administration.”

SOURCE

Next Page »
Expressed written permission is required to use any material on this site. (c) 2010 DAVIDSAWYER.org
This site uses WordPress and an altered version of the Barecity theme.
Designed on a Mac, geared towards forsaking Internet Explorer-- deal with it.